VOTE NO to Tanner Hall Planned Development District (PDD)
Comments
#405
Comerical zoning would serve the city better.Erin Bootle (Hanahan, 2021-07-31)
#406
I’m signing because Hanahan is already overcrowded. We don’t have the infrastructure to support this proposed building project.Mary Kay Colliton (Hanahan, 2021-07-31)
#408
We don't need them. Traffic is bad enough.Stephen Cass (Hanahan, 2021-07-31)
#411
too much traffic, not enough infrastructureAmy Allen (Hanahan, 2021-07-31)
#413
Overcrowding an already packed development. Concers of how this will effect the infrastructure in Tanner Plantation and adjoining neighborhoods. Concerns on how it will effect our home prices and even taxes when looking at school size, first responders, etc.Duffy Campbell (Hanahan, 2021-07-31)
#414
I vote NO!Susan Herring (Hanahan, 2021-07-31)
#415
Enough is enoughRenae Sayers (Hanahan, 2021-07-31)
#418
I’m singing because we do not want multi family housing in our neighborhood. The infrastructure does not support it and will devalue everyones property values. We choose to move to Hanahan because of the small town feel. We did not want to deal with the traffic, over population and crime of comparable communities. Do not ruin one of the best communities in the Charleston area buy letting greed and out of state corporations destroy our safe quiet community. Bring more local business instead. If this happens I will sell my home. I planned on raising our family in this community, but will sell before my property is devalued. That’s how strongly my family feels about this!Cliff McLeod (Hanahan, 2021-07-31)
#419
Growth should be instituted at the same rate local public safety, infrastructure, and school growth allows. Over population is detrimental to the greater good. Money can't fix everything.Kristy Duffy (Hanahan, 2021-07-31)
#420
City does not need this many residents in a small area for overloading schools.Joey Lee (Hanahan, 2021-07-31)
#426
Apartments will negatively impact our community, lead to more traffic, overcrowded schools and reduced home values.Brian Rafferty (Hanahan, 2021-07-31)
#432
Our area is already overcrowded. We need more businesses/schools and less residential developments. The schools cannot accommodate the growth.Pam Owens (Hanahan, 2021-07-31)
#433
We need more businesses like a gas station & restaurants. Our streets are already backed up due to so many residents living in this small area. We don’t need more multi-family housing here in Tanner Plantation.Anne Semmler (Hanahan, 2021-07-31)
#444
We need to have the infrastructure to support all these new residents.Shiran Algai (Hanahan, 2021-08-01)
#447
I would like more trees and shade. Apartment building aren't worth it. Where is the actual town of Hanahan? Let's develop that first.Jaime Stacy (Hanahan, 2021-08-01)
#452
I live in Tanner Plantation.Taznerda Haley (Hanahan, 2021-08-01)
#453
I’m a long time resident of Hanahan and all three of my adult children live in homes in Tanner.Cathy Dillo (Hanahan, 2021-08-01)
#456
I agree with everything outlined in this petition. My family and I moved to Hanahan last year because of its small town feel and family values. I'd rather see small businesses succeed rather than traffic grow and our home values drop.Jason Stoyles (Hanahan, 2021-08-01)
#458
This will lead to more congestion at the light and take valuable space that could be used for business.Jesse James (Hanahan, 2021-08-01)
#460
Way too much traffic already !!!!!Janet Magnemi (Hanahan, 2021-08-01)
#466
We do not need the apartments. The ones that are in that area have already caused several problems and issues.Ralph Martin (Hanahan, 2021-08-01)
#467
Privacy, destroying natural environment and traffic is already too much for current infrastructure.Michael Cornell (Hanahan, 2021-08-01)
#469
Vote NO our roads and schools cannot accommodate this complex. A strain on our PD and FD as welllouis russo (hanahan, 2021-08-01)
#472
I'm signing because I think that area should grow businesses, not mor living spaces. There are now many multi unit type properties in close proximity to the proposed location. We do not need more apartments.Julia Morton (Hanahan, 2021-08-01)
#474
As a homeowner at Bowen, there is a traffic, noise and crime concern with adding 400 apartment units. Additionally, this will negatively impact the value of homes in the local communities.Jenna Breard (Hanahan, 2021-08-01)
#477
I don’t agree with building 400 new aptsJoe Pecoraro (Hanahan, 2021-08-01)
#481
I vote No.Katherine Cullen (8, 2021-08-01)
#485
No more apartments. Keep our schools zoned appropriately. We also have way to much traffic on north Rhett already. We need to stop the over development of the area.Ashley Brace (Hanahan, 2021-08-01)
#486
James LecqueTammie Lecque
James Lecque (Hanahan, 2021-08-01)
#487
I live in Sweetgrass BlvdAlly Nichols-Sells (Hanahan, 2021-08-01)
#490
No more development!!!! Enough alreadyBrian Amara (Hanahan, 2021-08-01)
#494
Our community and infrastructure cannot accommodate another large development of apartments or condos. Our schools and streets will become severely overcrowded. Property value for those who live near this proposed development will decrease.Brooke Jessup (Hanahan, 2021-08-01)
#495
I do not believe in over crowding an area that can not accommodate more traffic, nor space for children at the current schools.Jennifer Smith (Hanahan, 2021-08-01)
#498
I am signing because we have already run so much of the wildlife out of this area. It is already congested enough. Stop the building.Marsha Zeigler (Hanahan, 2021-08-01)
#499
I am rejecting to the new project with all the new apartments!Mary Fitzwater (Hanahan, SC, 2021-08-01)
#505
Traffic increase and detrimental to single family home value.Edmund Conville (Hanahan, 2021-08-01)
#510
There is presently too much traffic on this road and this land could be better used for more amenities for the existing community.E.J. Foreman (Hanahan, 2021-08-01)
#513
Hanahan is sorely lacking retail, dining, and entertainment venues. The surrounding area of our small community is vastly industrial with the closest real retail/dining locale in Park Circle, which is Charleston County. This property would be put to much better use supporting small, family owned businesses and attracting foot traffic from the existing surrounding neighborhoods. More apartments will lower home values, add to already congested roads, and further strain Hannah’s already limited resources.Julia Grimm (Hanahan, 2021-08-01)
#520
I believe this would decrease my quality of life as a resident of Tanner HallStephanie Driggers (Hanahan, 2021-08-01)
#522
No more homes needed for these roadsBarbara Johnson (Hanahan, 2021-08-01)
#526
The unused commercial space can be converted into housing, like the old RiteAid on North Rhett. We need more green space and parks in Hanahan not apartments.Renee Szczepanski (Hanahan, 2021-08-01)
#534
Over crowded and not neededMary Holland (Hanahan, 2021-08-01)
#535
I’m signing because our small town that I was born and raised in is already over crowded and we do not need anymore apartments!Summer Dukes (Hanahan, 2021-08-01)
#537
We cannot add hundreds of residents without proper infrastructure in place. This will cause a traffic nightmare, overcrowding of already crowded schools, and will take away from the beauty of Hanahan. Keep green space. Don't be greedy!Arpi Hartnett (Hanahan, 2021-08-01)
#539
It’s crowded enough, we still pay to just drive on Tanner Boulevard and you want you add more revenue with out compensating us that has been living in the community over 15 years. I say NO!Michael Chiodo (Hanahan, 2021-08-01)
#544
We don’t need any more housing! WE FULL! GO BACK TO OHIO!!!!John Ball (Hanahan, 2021-08-01)
#545
I would hate to see my city get more crammed and our land ruined for profit it’s disgustingLaycie Gwynn (Hanahan, 2021-08-02)
#546
We already have too many people in Tanner. I love the neighborhood but let’s keep it to a limit.Tabitha Suggs (Hanahan, 2021-08-02)
#549
I do not agree to the multi-family use of land around Tanner Hall. The neighborhood is already crowded. We need natural areas or business instead of hundreds of cars.Kelly Truluck (Hanahan, 2021-08-02)
#553
This would have a negative impact on our community!!!Brianna Stevick (Hanahan, 2021-08-02)
#557
This development will have a negative impact on the livability of Hanahan. The zoning should not be changed and city council should seek commercial development of this landSteve Morton (Hanahan, 2021-08-02)
#563
Our town has enough apartment buildings and with 300+ more residents, the roads will be more backed up than they already are!! Build some shopping boutiques, restaurants, etc. to increase the value of our homes and neighborhoods. An area like Mixon in Summerville would be ideal!Kelly Atkinson (Hanahan, 2021-08-02)
#567
There's absolutely no need to grant multi-unit use. The land has been available for years ready for the owner to develop as single family use. The land owner is all about greed or he would not seek to develop multi-unit property in such a warm and beautiful neighborhood. It's purely an opportunistic move that will negatively impact the lives of all Tanner Hall and Tanner Plantation home owners and their families.Our Hanahan community, including Mayor Christie Rainwater should block this move as it does not put Hanahan residents first. She could equally test the land owners integrity by blocking any additional multi-family zoning in the area for 10-15 years. This proactive move would show that Hanahan puts families ahead of land developers profits. Additionally, the timeframe would encourage greedy developers to build single-family dwellings as originally intended.
Rob Chelton (Hanahan, 2021-08-02)
#568
Too many new residents too soon. Schools likely unable to accommodate. Traffic.Jennifer Lee (Hanahan, 2021-08-02)
#569
I would prefer this land to be zoned for business use. Keep money in Hanahan!Jeremy Watts (Hanahan, 2021-08-02)
#571
We don’t need anymore apartments/condosShane Winn (Hanahan, 2021-08-02)
#573
Over crowding. No more apartments, we need businesses.Lauren Foster (Hanahan, 2021-08-02)
#577
We do not need rental apartments deteriorating the value of our homes and community.Joseph Pascale (Hanahan, 2021-08-02)
#579
Already overcrowded. Need businesses not more people, traffic, crime, etc. Apartments have already quadrupled in Tanner in the past 2 years. No more!!Steve McAllister (Hanahan, 2021-08-02)
#580
I’m signing because I live in Hanahan and would love to see more single family homes and business come to the area instead of apartments.Rebecca Sosa (Hanahan, 2021-08-02)
#584
I'm signing this because I am concerned about traffic and overcrowded schools.Meegan Baxley (Hanahan, 2021-08-02)
#585
All of the reasons outlined above.Cathy Myzell (Hanay, 2021-08-02)
#586
I don't want to let developers who don't even live here chase a targeted 8% return on their investments (according to Panther Management's own documents) while the quality of life suffers for those of us who do live here.Thomas Spade (Hanahan, 2021-08-02)
#592
I do not want additional apartments and growth to crowd our streets and development.Tom Cameron (Hanahan, 2021-08-02)
#597
I live in Tanner Plantation and it is already too crowed for our infrastructure. The fire department is only 2-3 firefighters at each station and we don’t have the man power to support this new construction. Also, the roads are already backed up from all the traffic in Tanner Plantation not to mention those that use us as a cut through to 526. Low income apartments will bring property values down and bring in more issues that we don’t need in our community. The one school we have in Tanner plantation is already crowded.April Slagle (Hanahan, 2021-08-02)