COS Department exam entrance allowance

Quoted post


Guest

#29 Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:

2016-11-11 13:22

#28: - Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:  

 So it's fine to lie if it only half a lie?

If a petition is going to be seen as credible it should not to be ladened with inaccuracy, because if it is, then if anyone looks at it they will straight up assume everything is inaccurate. Help your cause don’t dismantle it.

 

Replies


Guest

#31 Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:

2016-11-11 13:35:11

#29: - Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:  

 I made a mistake and I acknowledge it, due to misinformation. I was under the impression that the ASM videos were a part of the test where as it was not but that does not take away the fact that Chapter 4(50% of theory) was only uploaded a day prior to the test. One incorrect point does not make the rest of the points invalid. And besides that everything that we have stated in our petition are legitimate issues.

 

Do you then agree with the fact that, everything that has been done is fair and square in the COS modules, or do you think this semester has been unfair for both the teachers and students and so the students should be met at a half way point in order to compensate them?

And why is the COS department ignoring the call for fair treatment, unlike students from other faculties who are being compensated for the issues that even we have faced?