PROTECT TUNSTALL COMMUNITY

Quoted post


Guest

#407 Re:

2014-05-09 16:31

#390: -

The funny thing about this whole debacle is that the majority of people do appose the build and do not want the extra traffic, 420 children and the problems that it all brings we have all vented our feelings to SBC KCC etc etc but it seems when you are up against a brainwashed crowd, the applicant, the landowner and then ultimately the person that makes the decision, it becomes apparant that we as individuals have no choice any more. So those that live on the sprawling estates and want to drive everywhere and ruin everybody elses lives then you do so, however the MAJORITY of people that moved to TUNSTALL want a better life and are OPPOSED AND FOR EVER MORE BE OPPOSED to the ruination of KENT.

As a kentish person LONG LIVE KENT!! Stop the rot!!

 

Replies


Guest

#408 Re: Re:

2014-05-10 13:14:44

#407: - Re:

"The majority of the people....."

 

Which people would these be? Out of what statistic are you taking the "majority" from?  If people really wanted "rural kent" then there are much better locations to buy a house than a 1 road hamlet, right next to Kent Science park, with one access road being a main thoroughfare and the other end linking to the motorway.

Take Bredgar for example, plenty of space for rural living out there.

I would assume that people who moved to tunstall did so for the "ruralesque" appearance yet with the really handy access to both motorway and local amenities.

 

If you want rural, don't do it by halves, go rural.