Allow Body Art in Tremonton, Utah

I think it's atrocious that a city would be so underhanded to revoke a business license over a single failure (less than .25% of the total business that's been done there just in tattoos) where separate punishment has also been meted out and met; above and beyond that, to do so without making allowances for the business owner to even be present at the meeting seems like a town bent on shutting down a business whether it is on honorable terms or not. Is it that one teen got an unauthorized tattoo that's the concern, or that someone in town is providing tattoos to people who want them? This just makes it seem like the town and the locals are intolerant and closed-minded and wanted to capitalize on an unforeseen situation to get what they want, or there wouldn't have been a problem with allowing the owner to be present after getting out of the hospital.