Hands Off Hartlebury Common

#1435: - Re: pretending to be someone else again. Tut , tut.

I AM NOT ONE TO MAKE ANY REMARKS ABOUT A PERSONS APTITUDE, MY IN PUT INTO THIS PAGE IS BASED ON LAW, PARLIAMENTARY LEGISLATION TO WHICH I AM FAMIULAR, AND USE ON DAY TO DAY BASIS, I TOO CAN MISPELL WORDS, ANYONE CAN, BUT INTELEGENCE OF THE READER SHOULD BE ABLE TO FOLLOW THE LINE OF ARGUMENT, ENOUGH SAID!

NOW MR GUEST, THE STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS PROVIDES THAT IT IS UNLAWFUL TOO; LIGHT FIRES, TOO CAMP AND TO ENTER ONTO AND OVER COMMON LAND BY CYCLE ANY MOTOR PROPELLED VEHICLE AND TO EXERCISE, TRAIN OR TO RIDE HORSES ONTO COMMON LAND.

BY NOT, DEMANDING FROM WCC PROOF OF OWNERSHIP, THEN YOUR ARGUMENT IS A PERSONAL ONE, IT IS ONE THAT YOU YOURSELF BELIEVE IN, WHICH I CAN ASSURE YOU IS INCORRECT.

THE ACCEPTANCE THAT HORSS MAY ENTER HARTLEBURY COMMON IS HEARSAY, THE COURTS, AT SOME STAGE WILL BE INVITED TO JUDGE ON THIS AND OTHER MATTERS SHOULD;SOMEONE GET INJURED BY A HORSE WHEN THE INJURED SEEK DAMAGES.

THE COURTS WILL ALSO BE GUIDED TO SECTIONS 47-1 AND 47-2 OF THE REPEAL OF THE ENCLOSURE ACT, THIS IS IN RESPONSE TO YOUR MENTION OF THE GATES.

THE WARDEN? THIS IS A PERSON IMPOSED ON MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC BY WCC, HE HAS NO AUTHORITY ON THIS COMMON, WHICH WILL ALSO BE EXPOSED IN ANY COURT, THE COUNCIL HAVE NO JURISDICYION ON HARTLEBURY COMMON.

YOU MAY OF COURSE ARGUE WITH MY KNOWLEDGE, IN A DEMOCRATIC SOCIETY IT IS YOUR RIGHTS, BUT SHOULD YOU GET INJURED BY "WALKING INTO ANY UNLAWFULLY PLACED IMPEDIMENT" OR FALL, SLIP ON ALTERED GROUND SURFACES, OR GET INJURED BY A HORSE OR CYCLE, I WILL CHALLENGE YOU TO CLAIM COMPENSATION FROM THE COUNCIL.

THEY ARE NOT INSURED, THEY HAVE NO PUBLIC LIABILITY IN PLACE.

TONY BARNETT