PROTECT TUNSTALL COMMUNITY

I would like to ask, why was this the only site that KCC considered using?
I appreciate that it's KCC owned, but isn't Grade 2 Agricultural Land protected

The original options were all non starters, and as far as I am aware, KCC Highways have never submitted an opinion or report confirming that they support
this location. The plans show 3 accesses into the site, two pedestrian, and one vehicular. There are no foot ways (in my day they were called footpaths) on the proposed school site, so parents & children will have to cross this busy road, unless they are driven in! which they claim they don't want.

It's said that 119 car park spaces will be sufficient, only 73 of these for drop offs leaving, 39 for staff, and 7 covering disabled etc. now this is for 2FE,
The existing 1FE has 32 staff and parents have access to the. Village Hall Car Park, 56 spaces I think, so could someone explain how this is going to be better because I would really like to understand

I would also like to throw into the mix, this new school. 21st Century building that parents are supporting, and I understand their reasons! Truly I do
Why is there no changing rooms, or showers, and I only counted 24 ish toilets These are infants, and one assumes, still learning control. I also liked the statement, Natural Ventilation. Do you think that means when it's hot they open a window, and when it's cold, they close it. Wow, things have certainly moved on since I went to school!!!!!!!!